AntiPlagiarism.NET Review - Best Duplicate Content Checker Tool?
Read more here
not able to download this software
Check your SPAM folder. If you have problems with downloading - write here: http://antiplagiarism.net/contacts/. We'll send you the program.
I am facing problem with final report generated by Antiplagiarism software of your.
Kindly correct it and please don't send generic reply
What is the problem?
You can choose ".html" report format in "File / Save report / Save as type" if you have any problems with default ".docx" format.
".docx" format is supported only if you have Microsoft Word installed on your Windows or Microsoft Office 2010 Filter Packs (it's free)
thanks, which has providing this software very much useful for us.
One of my colleagues referred me to your app, but it seems like it only runs on Windows.
Is there a version for Mac?
Wendy, there isn't version for Mac
The program is good but I have difficult to understand the parameters and the help section is very summarized for example: in general preferences what is the difference between "whole document" and "per 1000 words"? The plagiarism percentage is considerable different when I choose one or other. What happens when the system do the express check? It is also different comparatively to the normal test...
The work is based upon drawing up samples from the checked document, and these samples are being used as a request for search engines (the number of samples can be chosen in "Preferences / General / Basic parameters / Number od samples"). If you chose the option "for the whole document" the number of samples is given for the whole document regardless of its size.
If you chose the option "per 1000 words" the finite number of samples depends upon the size of the checked document.
So if you chose 50 "Number of samples" "per 1000 words" there will be 100 requests for search engines when you check a document containing 2000 words. It is preferable to chose "per 1000 words" option.
The difference between such ways of checking as "Express", "Standart" и "Deep" is the number of samples chosen (that is, the number of search engine requests).
The more samples there are, the more thoroughly the cheking is made - and the longer it takes.
It is preferable to chose "Standart" or "Deep" ways of checking.
antiplagiarism program help me very well and i appreciate for its checking with no of links and so my final report becomes copy free
your AntiPlagiarism.NET is going superb but u must provide it for free to those students who are learning and taking huge advantage from it
25.04.16,Mehran Ud din:comment
I have no complaint just i have one question about that the data which i check through this software would be submitted to net or not? means that my data will be safe after checking on it??
It is a nice product with features like speed and accuracy in terms of best findings in comparison to other tools.
A small thing that is required is the report in html format.
You can choose html format for saving reports (File / Save report / Save as type => *.html)
please describe colour meaning when report is genertated it show various colour in context.explain colour indication .
Colors are random (except yellow that means a match with more than one source).
i've downladed it just now, already given it a try - soooo nice stuff!
This one is real good, i didn't expect it would be so user friendly, but turned out it is. I had no prob using it