Reviews

16.05.16,nitschke:comment

The program is good but I have difficult to understand the parameters and the help section is very summarized for example: in general preferences what is the difference between "whole document" and "per 1000 words"? The plagiarism percentage is considerable different when I choose one or other. What happens when the system do the express check? It is also different comparatively to the normal test...
Thanks  

18.05.16,moderator:comment

The work is based upon drawing up samples from the checked document, and these samples are being used as a request for search engines (the number of samples can be chosen in "Preferences / General / Basic parameters / Number od samples"). If you chose the option "for the whole document" the number of samples is given for the whole document regardless of its size.
If you chose the option "per 1000 words" the finite number of samples depends upon the size of the checked document.
So if you chose 50 "Number of samples" "per 1000 words" there will be 100 requests for search engines when you check a document containing 2000 words. It is preferable to chose "per 1000 words" option.
The difference between such ways of checking as "Express", "Standart" и "Deep" is the number of samples chosen (that is, the number of search engine requests).
The more samples there are, the more thoroughly the cheking is made - and the longer it takes.
It is preferable to chose "Standart" or "Deep" ways of checking.  

04.05.16,Sangita Jaju:comment

antiplagiarism program help me very well and i appreciate for its checking with no of links and so my final report becomes copy free
thank you  

28.04.16,Mawara Ali:comment

your AntiPlagiarism.NET is going superb but u must provide it for free to those students who are learning and taking huge advantage from it  

25.04.16,Mehran Ud din:comment

I have no complaint just i have one question about that the data which i check through this software would be submitted to net or not? means that my data will be safe after checking on it??  

16.05.16,moderator:comment

Mehran Ud din, read more: http://antiplagiarism.net/product/  

21.04.16,Anand Motwani:comment

It is a nice product with features like speed and accuracy in terms of best findings in comparison to other tools.
A small thing that is required is the report in html format.  

16.05.16,moderator:comment

You can choose html format for saving reports (File / Save report / Save as type => *.html)  

22.01.16,k vyas:comment

please describe colour meaning when report is genertated it show various colour in context.explain colour indication .  

16.05.16,moderator:comment

Colors are random (except yellow that means a match with more than one source).  

26.04.12,JFK112263:comment

i've downladed it just now, already given it a try - soooo nice stuff!  

26.04.12,papermoon:comment

This one is real good, i didn't expect it would be so user friendly, but turned out it is. I had no prob using it  

26.04.12,Alex:comment

Super program!  

27.10.11,GekjcgrxGUT:comment

Hey, sbutle must be your middle name. Great post!  

03.10.11,yINWyETBb:comment

We've arrived at the end of the line and I have what I need!  

22.09.11,Fad:comment

With the completely redesigned interface  

24.04.11,yanavit:comment

The program is great! Thanks  

16.04.11,Marmelad:comment

The program is very good, if I notice any bugs I`ll write you about it. May be I`ll be of service to help to improve it.  

Enter your nickname:
Review text:



By clicking "Add review", you confirm that you have read and accepted the terms of our Privacy Policy.

AntiPlagiarism.NET -
Plagiarism Detection Software
List of benefits
  • Accurately determine the percentage of the uniqueness of the text
  • Locate and highlight non-unique snippets of text directly on the restored copy of the webpage
  • Сarry out the batch search of the whole files folder
The free full version is available during a day
Download
  • Check the web pages for uniqueness
  • Look for matches to the stored copies of the search engines
  • Work with proxy lists etc.